![]() |
Podcasts | Community | Create a Podcast |
|
|
|||
kerrywilbury's PodcastGive it a listen! |
|||
|
I talk to Roger Waters during his Radio KAOS show
June 11, 2008 11:38 AM PDT
Here is the “calls from the hall” segment of the September 20, 1987 Radio KAOS concert. This Q&A segment took place during the intermission with Roger Waters. Because of my question for Waters, I was the first caller to be picked. I was told that I would be caller #2. I stood there watching while the guy screening people to talk with Waters. Informed the next person, that if he wanted to talk with Waters. He would have to ask the questions the screener gave him. He agreed to the terms and became caller #1. I asked Waters if the man he is singing about in the song "5:01 am (the pros & cons of hitch hiking)." Is he the same man that the songs "Two Suns in the Sunset" and "Not Now John" are written about his (my) poster? I could sense Waters was trying not to answer my question. That is when I reminded Waters that my first name is hidden within the song "Not Now John." Waters finally answered, "I think the answer to that is, yes." That’s right; Waters acknowledge that those three songs were about me and my poster. The audience had never heard who, and what these songs were really written about, they were confused. The audience needed time to absorb this new information. Jim Ladd needed to throw chaos into the situation. The last thing Waters needed was for the truth behind these songs to come out. Jim Ladd jumped in and insinuates that I was on acid. Referring to an announcement made in 1969, during the Woodstock festival. Instead of the audience asking who is this guy? Ladd got the audience to dismiss my Q& A with Waters, as LSD nonsense. The following is the definition of the common logical fallacy that Jim Ladd used against me. Argumentum ad Hominem is literally "argument directed at the man". The Abusive variety of Argumentum ad Hominem occurs when, instead of trying to disprove the truth of an assertion, the arguer attacks the person or people making the assertion. This is invalid because the truth of an assertion does not depend upon the goodness of those asserting it. Here is the link to the definition above: www.virtualschool.edu/mon/SocialConstruction/Logic.html Now ask yourself, why would Jim Ladd want to conceal the truth about these songs? In 1987 Waters was still involved in a lawsuit with David Gilmour, over the name Pink Floyd. It wasn’t in Waters best interest, for the public to know how big a role I played in the creation of his songs. I cite Waters answer to caller #1’s first question, in order to backup my statement. Waters answer to my question, contradicted press releases about those songs. I was uncovering the truth publicly. I was revealing facts that could have been used to hurt Waters, during the lawsuit with Gilmour. That is the reason why, Jim Ladd slandered me. Sherlock Holmes meets The WHO?June 17, 2008 07:02 PM PDT
The Sherlock Holmes movie Dressed To Kill, was just one of the movies that inspired me in my youth. I drew on that inspiration when I started putting together this musical mystery.
2. Hamid is the driver and murderer, in the Sherlock Holmes movie. Pete Townshend sings the name Hamid in the song “Trilby’s Piano” by The WHO.
4. Some of the best mysteries have spies in them. I refer to the entertainers involved in my mystery as corporate spies. "Spies Like Us"
June 11, 2008 10:57 AM PDT
If you liked the Beatles "Paul is Dead" story. Then you will enjoy this musical mystery.
|
About kerry doughertyFollowersKerry dougherty's FriendsContact MeSubscribe to this Podcast![]() |
||